Phase 13

Terraforming

The centuries-long project to make Mars habitable.

Timeline estimate: 2200s and beyond

Terraforming Mars: A Multi-Century Project to Make the Red Planet Habitable

Terraforming — the process of deliberately altering a planet's environment to make it suitable for Earth life — sits at the far horizon of Mars exploration. It is not a plan for the 21st century. Most scientific estimates place even the earliest meaningful milestones centuries away, with full habitability requiring a thousand years or more. Yet the science behind it is real, the engineering challenges are being studied seriously, and understanding the scope of terraforming is essential to grasping what long-term Mars colonization actually means.

Why Mars Is a Candidate (and Why It's So Difficult)

Mars is the most Earth-like planet in the solar system, but the comparison only goes so far. Its surface pressure averages about 610 pascals — less than 1% of Earth's sea-level pressure. Average surface temperatures hover around -60°C (-76°F), though they range from about -125°C at the poles in winter to a relatively mild 20°C near the equator on a summer afternoon. The atmosphere is 95% carbon dioxide, with negligible oxygen or nitrogen. There is no global magnetic field to shield the surface from solar wind and cosmic radiation.

These are not small obstacles. They are civilization-scale engineering problems. But they are not impossible ones — at least in principle.

Phase 1: Warming the Planet

The first and most foundational step in any terraforming scenario is raising the global temperature enough to prevent liquid water from instantly boiling away or freezing. This requires thickening the atmosphere, which in turn requires releasing greenhouse gases.

Releasing Frozen CO₂

Mars holds a significant reservoir of CO₂ locked in its polar ice caps and adsorbed in the regolith. NASA-funded research published in 2018 in Nature Astronomy, led by Bruce Jakosky and Christopher Edwards, estimated that even if all accessible CO₂ on Mars were released, it would only raise atmospheric pressure to around 1–2% of Earth's — not enough for breathable air, but potentially enough to allow liquid water on the surface and slow some heat loss. Methods proposed for releasing this CO₂ include:

  • Orbital mirrors: Large reflective structures — potentially kilometers across — positioned in Mars orbit to focus sunlight on the polar caps, sublimating dry ice into the atmosphere. Theoretical designs have been discussed in NASA and academic literature for decades.
  • Impacting volatile-rich asteroids or comets: Redirecting small bodies to deliver water, ammonia, and other volatiles directly to the Martian surface, adding mass to the atmosphere and introducing nitrogen and hydrogen. This would require asteroid redirection technology far beyond anything currently operational.
  • Industrial greenhouse gas production: Factories on Mars producing powerful synthetic greenhouse gases — such as perfluorocarbons (PFCs) or sulfur hexafluoride — could trap heat far more efficiently than CO₂. A 1993 study by Zubrin and McKay calculated that sufficient PFC production could raise Mars's temperature by 10–20°C over decades, though the energy requirements would be enormous.

Phase 2: Building a Breathable Atmosphere

Even after warming Mars and raising surface pressure, the atmosphere would be unbreathable — rich in CO₂ but lacking oxygen and nitrogen in useful quantities. Converting the atmosphere to something humans can survive in without suits is a process that most models suggest would take centuries at minimum.

Biological Approaches: Pioneer Organisms

The most discussed pathway to oxygenating Mars involves engineered or specially selected microorganisms — extremophiles capable of surviving Martian conditions, photosynthesizing, and producing oxygen as a byproduct. Cyanobacteria, which transformed Earth's own atmosphere roughly 2.4 billion years ago during the Great Oxidation Event, are a natural reference point. Research programs including NASA's synthetic biology initiatives have investigated organisms that could tolerate high CO₂, low pressure, and UV radiation.

MOXIE — the Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment aboard NASA's Perseverance rover — has already demonstrated that oxygen can be produced from Martian CO₂ electrochemically. While MOXIE was a small-scale proof of concept, a scaled-up version of this technology could contribute to early atmospheric modification efforts.

Nitrogen: The Missing Ingredient

Earth's atmosphere is 78% nitrogen, which acts as a buffer gas critical for sustaining life and preventing oxygen-rich fires. Mars has very little accessible nitrogen — perhaps 2.6% of what thin atmosphere already exists. Where this nitrogen would come from at terraforming scale remains one of the field's most unresolved problems. Cometary delivery, nitrogen-fixing organisms, or mining subsurface deposits are all theoretical options, none yet demonstrated.

Phase 3: Protecting the Surface — The Magnetic Field Problem

Mars lost its global magnetic field approximately 4 billion years ago when its core cooled and geodynamic activity ceased. Without this shield, the solar wind continuously strips gases from the upper atmosphere — one of the key reasons Mars lost much of its ancient, thicker atmosphere in the first place. Any terraforming effort that rebuilds the atmosphere must also address this ongoing loss.

One proposal, put forward by researchers including Jim Green (former NASA Chief Scientist) and colleagues in a 2017 paper, involves placing a large magnetic dipole shield at the Mars L1 Lagrange point — between Mars and the Sun — to deflect the solar wind before it reaches the planet. Simulations suggested this could allow Mars's atmospheric pressure to increase naturally over time. This remains theoretical but represents the kind of long-horizon thinking that serious terraforming science requires.

What Terraforming Cannot Do: Realistic Expectations

It is worth being direct about what current science tells us. Full terraforming of Mars to Earth-like conditions — breathable air at comfortable pressure, liquid water oceans, a protected biosphere — is not a near-term prospect by any reasonable measure. The 2018 Jakosky-Edwards analysis specifically concluded that Mars does not have enough accessible CO₂ to be terraformed using known resources and techniques to Earth-like pressure levels.

"There is not enough CO₂ remaining on Mars to provide significant greenhouse warming were it to be emplaced into the atmosphere; in addition, most of the CO₂ cannot be accessing using technology that could plausibly be deployed in the near future." — Jakosky & Edwards, Nature Astronomy, 2018

This does not mean terraforming is impossible — it means the full project likely depends on technologies, timescales, and resources we cannot yet specify. Partial terraforming, creating a warmer and slightly thicker atmosphere that allows liquid water in some regions, may be achievable over centuries. Full Earth-like conditions may require millennia, or may not be achievable at all without breakthroughs not yet imagined.

The Ethical Dimension

Terraforming Mars raises profound ethical questions that go beyond engineering. If Mars hosts microbial life — even subsurface, extremophile bacteria — intentionally altering its environment could constitute one of the most consequential acts humanity has ever taken. Planetary protection guidelines currently enforced by COSPAR (the Committee on Space Research) govern contamination of Mars by Earth organisms, and any terraforming program would require a global scientific and ethical consensus about whether and how to proceed.

Key Challenges

  • Insufficient accessible CO₂: Scientific analysis (Jakosky & Edwards, 2018) indicates Mars lacks enough accessible carbon dioxide to raise atmospheric pressure to breathable levels using currently conceivable methods.
  • No global magnetic field: Without a planetary magnetic shield, any rebuilt atmosphere will continue to be eroded by solar wind, requiring either an artificial shield at the L1 Lagrange point or another novel solution.
  • Nitrogen scarcity: Mars has very little accessible nitrogen, which is essential for a breathable, Earth-like atmosphere. Sourcing nitrogen at the required scale has no demonstrated solution.
  • Energy requirements: Producing sufficient greenhouse gases industrially, powering orbital mirrors, or sustaining biological terraforming operations at scale would require energy infrastructure far beyond anything currently planned for Mars.
  • Timescales beyond human planning horizons: Terraforming scenarios operate on timescales of centuries to millennia, making governance, continuity, and sustained commitment across generations an unprecedented institutional challenge.
  • Planetary protection and ethics: If Mars harbors extant microbial life, intentional terraforming could violate both scientific priorities and ethical principles around preserving extraterrestrial ecosystems.
  • Technological immaturity: Key technologies — orbital mirrors, asteroid redirection at scale, engineered pioneer organisms capable of surviving Martian conditions — remain theoretical or in early research stages.
  • Unknown subsurface reservoirs: The full inventory of Martian CO₂, water ice, and nitrogen stored in the crust and mantle is not yet known, making confident modeling of terraforming outcomes impossible.